Boarding line. A crowded gate. An agent asks a passenger to place her bag in the size checker.
It almost fits, but the front edge sticks out slightly. “Oversized – you’ll need to pay €60.”
She protests: “I’ve always used it!”. She pays so she won’t miss her flight. Around her, other travelers are shifting items into their pockets, zipping bags, and squeezing jackets.
This situation is no longer just occasional – it has become the everyday micro-politics of carry-on luggage on low-cost airlines.
We had already covered this topic in a previous article titled "Ryanair Hand Luggage 2025: Facts and Fake News", but the situation has since evolved, and passengers are still unsure whether the changes are for better or worse.
All airlines
All countries
If we don't win, you don't pay us
Hand luggage refers to the type of baggage that passengers are allowed to carry with them on board the aircraft.
This type of baggage is designed to be lightweight and compact, so it can be easily stored in the overhead compartments or under the seat in front of you.
Ryanair now emphasizes its one-size rule for under-seat luggage: 40×30×20 cm.
For many, it feels like an improvement compared to what they previously “believed” (they often used smaller bags before).
Unofficial online sources mention increases in fines/extra charges and alleged internal bonuses. However, no verifiable public documents are available. Still, the perception of strictness is widespread and consistent in passengers’ accounts.
The current situation presents an interesting paradox: with the introduction of broader official allowances for hand luggage, one would expect travelers to feel more at ease. Yet, this added flexibility seems to have had the opposite effect. Many passengers, feeling entitled to bring more, tend to overpack their bags and suitcases, which leads to an increase in borderline cases. As a result, disputes are perceived more often, and travelers are left with a greater sense of uncertainty.
One of the main factors influencing this dynamic is social observation. When travelers see someone being stopped for an oversized bag, collective anxiety rises. The fear of being next subjected to a strict inspection is palpable, creating an atmosphere of tension.
Moreover, there is the anticipation of the loss: the moment you have to pay a fine at the gate is particularly frustrating. This type of expense, imposed rather than chosen, feels much heavier than a voluntary purchase made before the flight. Experiencing a penalty creates a significant emotional burden.
Finally, many passengers start to practice a form of micro self-discipline. This means that, to avoid issues, they try to manage the volume and bulk of their luggage so as not to “stand out” visually. In other words, they make an effort to appear compliant with expectations, compressing their personal belongings and adapting to the required dimensions—even if it means sacrificing a bit of comfort.
These combined factors create a travel environment where concern over checks becomes an integral part of the experience, influencing every passenger’s decisions and behavior.
A key topic in discussions: gate agents may have incentives to flag oversized luggage. It is crucial to distinguish perception from actual policy.
Specific information regarding the incentives or rewards received by inspection staff—such as the exact amount of a bonus for each oversized baggage identified—is generally not available in official airline documents. Therefore, these figures should be treated with caution, as they often come from former employee accounts or online forum discussions. Consequently, it is important not to take them as definitive data, as they may vary or may not accurately reflect the airlines’ operational reality.
Over-enforcement refers to situations where authorities or inspectors apply the rules in an excessively strict way, often going beyond what would be considered reasonable.
To handle the hand luggage check more calmly and efficiently, here are some practical tips:
When it comes to ethics and reputation, it’s essential to balance short-term gains (such as increased revenue and tighter management) with medium-term risks, like losing customer trust and facing negative word of mouth.
Traditional airlines, for example, tend to focus on providing better service in order to reduce issues and maintain passenger loyalty.
Ryanair, on the other hand, seems to be pursuing a more aggressive strategy. While this may work in the short term, it risks alienating passengers in the long run. The real challenge for Ryanair will be to strike a balance between operational efficiency and customer satisfaction, without putting its reputation at stake.
“Internal pressure” refers to the dynamics and influences that push airport staff to be more strict in their checks.
During airport security checks, it is essential to maintain a proper attitude to ensure a positive and constructive interaction. Certain behaviors may jeopardize the situation and make communication with staff more difficult.
Transparency is essential for building trust between airport staff and passengers. Clear and honest communication can help reduce tensions and enhance the overall travel experience.
OBJECTIVE: Minimize the chances of being selected for a check. It’s not just about having the correct number of bags—it’s also about presenting yourself as a “low-risk” passenger.
Type | Why it works | Practical Note |
---|---|---|
Soft backpack 38×28×16 cm | It is well within the size limit. | Leave 1–2 cm of space at the top. |
Soft trapezoid bag | If it’s half-empty, it appears smaller. | Avoid placing rigid objects at the bottom. |
Stiff minimalist design, without pockets | It does not expand beyond its size. | Be careful with thick handles. |
Compression zipper backpack | Show that you can adapt. | Tighten your belts in line. |
Dark and anonymous bag | It doesn’t catch the eye. | Avoid large logos. |
Semi-empty foldable duffel bag | It adapts to the content. | Perfect for light weekend trips. |
Neutral colors and simple shapes help avoid drawing attention.
Avoid bags with many external pockets or bulges, as they can make your luggage appear larger than it actually is.
Here's how to do it in 3 simple steps:
It only takes 1 minute to discover the amount of your compensation.
Our legal team will collaborate with the airlines and authorities regarding your case.
As soon as we win the lawsuit, you will receive the money in your bank account
This table provides an overview of the baggage policies of major airlines in 2025. Always check the official airline websites for the most up-to-date information, as policies may change.
Airline | Free Baggage (cm) | Official and Practical Weight | Extra Personal Item | Empirical Tolerance | Upgrade for Trolley? | Quick Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ryanair | 40×30×20 | No official weight if “reasonable” | No (only Priority) | Low | Yes (Priority / purchase) | Frequent checks |
EasyJet | 45×36×20 | Not declared (only if it fits) | No | Medium | Yes (upgrade fees) | Visibly more relaxed |
Wizz Air | 40×30×20 | ≈10 kg tolerated | No (Priority) | Low | Yes | Strict during peaks |
Vueling | 40×30×20 | Not declared | With fares | Medium | Yes | Variable |
ITA Airways | 55×35×25 | 8 kg | Yes | Medium | No | Legacy model |
Lufthansa | 55×40×23 | 8 kg (sometimes more) | Yes | Medium-High | No | Moderate flexibility |
Air France | 55×35×25 | 12 kg (total) | Yes | High | No | Accommodating |
KLM | 55×35×25 | 12 kg (total) | Yes | High | No | Rarely punitive |
Iberia | 40×30×15 (trolley size may vary) | 10 kg | Yes | Medium | Sometimes | Depends on occupancy |
British Airways | 56×45×25 | 23 kg | Yes (40×30×15) | High | No | Generous |
Emirates | 55×38×20 | 7 kg | At discretion | Medium | No | Stricter at hubs |
Qatar Airways | 50×37×25 | 7 kg | Not always | Medium | No | Procedural |
Turkish Airlines | 55×40×23 | 8 kg | Yes | Medium | No | Variable by route |
Delta | 56×35×23 | No weight (domestic flight) | Yes | High | No | Pragmatic |
United | 56×35×23 | No weight (domestic flight) | Yes | High | No | Only on fully booked flights |
American Airlines | 56×36×23 | No weight (domestic flight) | Yes | High | No | Attention to regional flights |
Interpretation key: In low-cost airlines, the main issue is the second check-in; in legacy carriers, conflicts only arise when the overhead bins are full.
It’s important to note that the amounts requested at the gate are not legally considered "fines", but rather fees for mandatory additional services. Using emotional language can create confusion about the actual contractual nature of these charges.
We recommend using this form to file a claim regarding an under-seat baggage fee linked to your booking.
Please note that transport conditions, including baggage rules, can change over time.
Refly is not responsible for any changes to terms and conditions that may affect your claim.
We invite you to fill out the form carefully and provide all necessary information to make handling your claim as smooth as possible.
Dear Airline,
On [DATE] at gate [NUMBER] of flight [FLIGHT NUMBER], I was asked to pay €[AMOUNT] for an alleged non-compliance of my baggage (40×30×20 cm).
The item fully fit into the provided sizer (photos attached). I consider this charge unjustified and request a refund within 14 days, referring to the principles of transparency and contractual fairness (Directive 93/13/EEC; Articles 20–22 of the Consumer Code).
If not resolved, I will escalate this case to the appropriate ADR / ECC-Net bodies.
Best regards,
[FULL NAME]
[CONTACTS]
The compensation of $290 for a delayed flight specifically applies to flights under 1500 km.
The compensation of $450 for a delayed flight applies to flights between 1500 km and 3500 km.
The compensation of $660 for a delayed flight applies to flights over 3500 km.
Only a few air travelers are aware of their rights, and many of them lack the legal understanding necessary to claim compensation for flight delays. Even if they are aware of their rights, the process of requesting compensation from airlines can be challenging.